Member-only story
XRP Token Not a Security But Ripple’s Institutional Sales Broke the Law
In a significant decision with far-reaching implications for the crypto industry, a federal judge ruled that the XRP token is not a security. However, the judge also found that Ripple Lab’s activities, specifically its massive institutional sales of XRP, were in violation of securities laws. This split decision has created a complex legal situation that could have profound effects on the regulation of cryptocurrencies. In this article, we will explore the judge’s ruling, the implications for the crypto industry, and the ongoing case between Ripple and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
The XRP Token: Not a Security
In the judge’s ruling, it was determined that the XRP token itself does not meet the legal definition of a security. This distinction is crucial as it separates XRP from other cryptocurrencies that have been deemed securities, such as Bitcoin and Ethereum during their initial coin offerings (ICOs). The judge’s decision provides clarity on the regulatory status of XRP, acknowledging it as a digital asset rather than a security.
The ruling considers various factors, including the investment expectations of XRP holders, the level of centralization within the XRP ecosystem, and the degree of influence Ripple has over the token’s…
