Member-only story
SEC v. Ripple: Top Lawyer Highlights “Open Question” in Major Case
As the legal landscape of cryptocurrencies continues to be navigated in courtrooms across the United States, a critical juncture in the ongoing skirmish between Ripple and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is looming. In a recent tweet, James “MetaLawMan” Murphy highlighted the imminent ruling from Judge Torres on cross-motions for summary judgment in the SEC v. Ripple case. A significant question in the case is whether the Judge will consider the secondary sales of XRP, Ripple’s digital asset. The crux of the SEC v. Ripple case is whether XRP should be classified as a security. The SEC asserts that it is and should be regulated as such, while Ripple strongly disagrees. The consideration of secondary sales of XRP — transactions that take place between parties other than the original issuer — adds complexity to the case. If these secondary sales are deemed to be unregistered securities transactions, it could potentially bring significant problems for Ripple and have widespread repercussions for the broader cryptocurrency sector.
The SEC v. Ripple Case Overview
The SEC v. Ripple case has garnered significant attention within the cryptocurrency industry and beyond. Ripple, a technology company specializing in global payment solutions, finds itself in a legal battle with the SEC…
